Is it the mistake of our doctors that the medical system of our nation and the globe is at present a deadly travesty?
The fool’s paradise in which the doctors currently live, whereby they are forced to perform, supply unnecessary operations, vaccinations and prescribe drugs to prolong the profitable illness and uphold their ‘noble’ profession, is now deeply distrusted and corrupted.
Let me explain why!
Nobody supposes that doctors are less honourable than judges; but a judge whose income and reputation depended on whether the verdict is for the prosecutor or prosecuted, would be outrageously distrusted. But to present me a doctor as my judge and then manipulate his decision with incentives of largesums of money and a virtual guarantee that if he makes a mistake it can never be proved against him is to go wildly beyond the established custom with which most people will tolerate.
But this is happening right now.
Today doctors never hesitate to declare divine omniscience about vaccines, to clamour for laws to punish any scepticism on the part of the ordinary person.For example, a modern doctor thinks nothing of signing the death certificate of one of their patients who died of a vaccine consequence, and then can go into a court of law and swear under oath, that another patient who dead of the disease that the vaccine is supposed to protect against, that if they had had the vaccine they would not have died. Yet no barrister, apparently, dreams of asking for death statistics and safety data of the vaccine itself and of the vaccinated and unvaccinated people, on which alone any valid judgment could be founded.
The barrister is as gullible as the doctor is obsessed.
The unvaccinated will always be found guilty whilst nothing whatsoever has been proved except that someone died due to an illness without the interference of a doctor as effectively as any of the hundreds of people who die or are injured every day of vaccine consequences in the doctor’s care.
Barristers have been taught to regard any doubts of the omniscience and omnipotence of doctors as blasphemy.
Even the fact that doctors die themselves of the very complications vaccines cause passes unnoticed. Their reputation stands like an ancient King’s palace on a foundation of dead bodies and the result is that the verdict goes against the defendant when the defendant is a doctor accused of malpractice.
The only evidence that can decide a case of malpractice is expert evidence; that is the evidence of other doctors; and every doctor will allow a colleague to exterminate a whole country sooner than violate the medical profession by giving them away.
I do not blame them but the consequence of this is to make the medical profession conspire to hide its own shortcomings.
I have heard doctors deny that there is such a things as pre-menstrual tension, have heard them deny the existence of certain anxieties, I have even heard them deny that nutrition, fresh water, fresh air and sunshine as a health giver. But the one objection I have never heard from a doctor is their unequivocal defence ofvaccines.
But here’s the funny thing.
The doctor acquires the vaccines from the government who are being lobbiedby the pharmaceutical company for a hefty sum of money for their supply. The results of the vaccines can on occasion be so bad that you get the disease you’re supposed to be protected against. And doctors to save the reputation of the vaccine have been motivated to blame their patient or their patients parents of having contracted this disease independently of the vaccine, an explanationwhich naturally does not make the family any more submissive and leads to public blame in which the doctors, forget everything but the immediate quarrel, naively defend themselves by acknowledging and even claiming as a point in their favour, that it is often impossible to distinguish the disease produced by the vaccine and the disease they have accused the patient of contracting.
Naturally, the ‘poor’ doctor defends vaccinations frantically, as it means to them the extra bread on the table for their family.
So the medical profession now find themselves threatened with the extinction of a considerable part of their income. A part, too, that is easily and regularly earned, since it is independent of disease, and brings every person born into the nation, healthy or not, to the doctors for their shots. To boot, there is the customary bonus of an epidemic, with its panic and rush for re-vaccination. There’s no wonder the anger the doctors feel when they hear that the anti vaccination movement is on the raise.
Are the anti vaccinators doing a cruel, harmful, inconsiderate thing in a mental state of recklessness?
This is very puzzling to the average observer who knows nothing of the economic and scientific sides of the equation and therefore their ignorance sides with the medical propaganda. Public support is founded almost completely on the faith of the drug dealing doctors that help preach the ‘word’of great benefits and none of their side effects. The Achilles heel of vaccination, however, is not to be found in the pain it causes, but in the line of argument by which it is becomes obligatory.
The medical system even considering obligatory vaccinations is simply criminal anarchism at its very worst.
So the public influenced by the medical profession under the guidance of the pharmaceutical sector took up the vaccination craze with irresistible faith. The public’s ignorance of the laws of evidence and of research data can hardly be exaggerated. For example if a disease which normally attacks fifteen percent of the population actually increases the effect to twenty percent after the vaccine, the medical journal can publish this figure of twenty percent and convince the doctors and public that the preventative vaccine has reduced the percentage by eighty percent instead of increasing by five percent, because the pubic left to itself, the media and the old man down the street whom are always ready to remember on every subject that things used to be much worse that they are now, will assume that the former percentage was around one hundred percent.
This in vogue fashion with vaccines is the assumption by the public that every person infected with measles will succumb to its ‘deadly’ infection and die.
In the case of preventative vaccinations enforced by law, this delusion is growing sickeningly, because only the homeless or poor can evade it. Now these people have little power of resisting any disease. Their death rate and their case mortality rate are always high relatively to that of the working class. Nothing is easier, therefore, than to prove that compliance with any pubic law produces the most flattering results. It would be equally easy even if the regulation actually raised the death-rate, provided it did not raise it sufficiently to make the average householder, who cannot evade regulations, die as early as the average homeless or poor person and with the bonus of providing them with a lifetime of drugs.
What can be done?
In short doctors are trades people and are governed not by science but by supply and demand. However scientific a treatment may be, it cannot hold its place in the market if there is not demand for it. Nor for that matter can the grossest quackery be kept off the shelf if there is demand for it. We need a role reversal where by vaccines and other procedures and drugs are honestly prescribed for what patients really need rather than what the doctor can make from them. The doctor’s position will depend, not on the number of people who are chronically ill, and whom they can keep ill, but on the number of people who are well. They should be judged independently by the vital statistics of their locality. When the sickness rate goes up their credit goes down. And their salary depends on these issues of the health of their constituency under their charge. They will have a safe, dignified, responsible, independent position based wholly on the public health.
The only way this can happen is if the medical profession becomes a body of professionals paid by the government to keep the country in good health. Until this happens the medical system in our nations will continue becoming a mounting deadly travesty.
Ian Claxton 2019-05-10
There are two types of cold:
1) The cold - when the body is lacking something and simply by adding more clothes or eating warmer foods will alleviate this condition. (Interior)
2) The cold - when the body is cold & shivers caused by an external pathogenic invasion. This cannot be alleviated by adding clothes along. (Exterior)
I simply want to live a soulful and fulfilling life.